Kimmerobatis etchesi
Underwood & Claeson, 2017
Classification: Elasmobranchii Spathobatidae
Reference of the original description
The Late Jurassic ray Kimmerobatis etchesi gen. et sp. nov. and the Jurassic radiation of the Batoidea. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association, 130(3–4), 345–354
The Late Jurassic ray Kimmerobatis etchesi gen. et sp. nov. and the Jurassic radiation of the Batoidea. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association, 130(3–4), 345–354
Description:
Citation: Kimmerobatis etchesi Underwood & Claeson, 2017: In: Database of fossil elasmobranch teeth www.shark-references.com, World Wide Web electronic publication, Version 11/2024
Description
Original diagnose after Underwood & Claeson (2019) p. 346 [25550]: Batoid like Spathobatis (Thiollière, 1854) and Belemnobatis (Thiollière, 1854) characterised by “guitarfish” like form. Kimmer- obatis possesses a depressed body, caudal region large in proportion to disk, tail distinct from disk, fins aplesodic; hyomandibula with broad medial articulation with chondrocranium; unsegmented propterygia; no pectoral radials that articulate directly with scapulocoracoid between mesopterygium and metapterygium; synarcual short with vertebral centra nearly reaching neuro- cranium. Unlike Spathobatis, but like Belemnobatis, in having pectoral fins not extending to overlap pelvic fins and lacking enlarged placoid scales. Unlike Spathobatis and Belemnobatis in having subtriangular rostrum that fails to reach end of snout; no rostral appendix; incipient lingual uvula on teeth; post-pelvic process; neural spines of caudal region longer than centra; no fin spines; rugose axial cartilage of clasper.
Original diagnose after Underwood & Claeson (2019) p. 346 [25550]: Batoid like Spathobatis (Thiollière, 1854) and Belemnobatis (Thiollière, 1854) characterised by “guitarfish” like form. Kimmer- obatis possesses a depressed body, caudal region large in proportion to disk, tail distinct from disk, fins aplesodic; hyomandibula with broad medial articulation with chondrocranium; unsegmented propterygia; no pectoral radials that articulate directly with scapulocoracoid between mesopterygium and metapterygium; synarcual short with vertebral centra nearly reaching neuro- cranium. Unlike Spathobatis, but like Belemnobatis, in having pectoral fins not extending to overlap pelvic fins and lacking enlarged placoid scales. Unlike Spathobatis and Belemnobatis in having subtriangular rostrum that fails to reach end of snout; no rostral appendix; incipient lingual uvula on teeth; post-pelvic process; neural spines of caudal region longer than centra; no fin spines; rugose axial cartilage of clasper.
Remarks
shark-references Species-ID=14914;
type species of Kimmerobatis Underwood & Claeson, 2019 p. 346 [25550] by original designation (Art. 68.2 ICZN);
valid after Underwood & Claeson (2019) p. 346 [25550];
shark-references Species-ID=14914;
type species of Kimmerobatis Underwood & Claeson, 2019 p. 346 [25550] by original designation (Art. 68.2 ICZN);
valid after Underwood & Claeson (2019) p. 346 [25550];
References
Rostral and body shape analyses reveal cryptic diversity of Late Jurassic batomorphs (Chondrichthyes, Elasmobranchii) from Europe. Papers in Palaeontology, 10(2), Article e1552
DOI: 10.1002/spp2.1552
Radiation and divergence times of Batoidea. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 40(3), Article e1777147
DOI: 10.1080/02724634.2020.1777147
The Late Jurassic ray Kimmerobatis etchesi gen. et sp. nov. and the Jurassic radiation of the Batoidea. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association, 130(3–4), 345–354
DOI: 10.1016/j.pgeola.2017.06.009
Rostral and body shape analyses reveal cryptic diversity of Late Jurassic batomorphs (Chondrichthyes, Elasmobranchii) from Europe. Papers in Palaeontology, 10(2), Article e1552
DOI: 10.1002/spp2.1552
Radiation and divergence times of Batoidea. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 40(3), Article e1777147
DOI: 10.1080/02724634.2020.1777147
The Late Jurassic ray Kimmerobatis etchesi gen. et sp. nov. and the Jurassic radiation of the Batoidea. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association, 130(3–4), 345–354
DOI: 10.1016/j.pgeola.2017.06.009
