Isogomphodon aikenensis
Cicimurri & Knight, 2019
Classification: Elasmobranchii Carcharhiniformes Carcharhinidae
Reference of the original description
Late Eocene (Priabonian) elasmobranchs from the Dry Branch Formation (Barnwell Group) of Aiken County, South Carolina, USA. PaleoBios, 36, 1–31
Late Eocene (Priabonian) elasmobranchs from the Dry Branch Formation (Barnwell Group) of Aiken County, South Carolina, USA. PaleoBios, 36, 1–31
Types
Isogomphodon aikenensis
Holotype: SC: 2013.38.110; Paratype: SC: 2013.38.111; SC: 2013.38.119; SC: 2013.38.112; SC: 2013.38.115;
Isogomphodon aikenensis
Holotype: SC: 2013.38.110; Paratype: SC: 2013.38.111; SC: 2013.38.119; SC: 2013.38.112; SC: 2013.38.115;
Description:
Citation: Isogomphodon aikenensis Cicimurri & Knight, 2019: In: Database of fossil elasmobranch teeth www.shark-references.com, World Wide Web electronic publication, Version 11/2024
No image available.
Please send your images of "Isogomphodon aikenensis" to
info@shark-references.com
Please send your images of "Isogomphodon aikenensis" to
info@shark-references.com
Description
Original diagnose after Cicimurri & Knight (2019) p. 11 [27380]: Nearly 400 specimens are referred to the new species, which differs from Recent Isogomphodon oxyrhynchus (Müller and Henle 1841) in that all teeth have smooth cutting edges extending from the apex to the very base of the crown. In contrast, the upper teeth of the extant species are weakly serrated and edges of lower anterior teeth are often limited to the upper half of the crown. In addition, the Eocene teeth have shorter cusps, many exhibit very convex lateral shoulders (especially more lateral positions), and the root lobes are more elongated and divergent (Herman et al. 1991, Compagno et al. 2005). The new species differs from the fossil species I. acuarius (Probst 1879), I. lerichei (Darteville and Casier 1943), I. caunellensis (Cappetta 1970), and I. gracilis (Jonet 1966) in being smaller in overall size. Additionally, the Dry Branch species has narrower upper anterior teeth and complete cutting edges on all teeth when compared to I. caunellensis, and the convexity of the lateral shoulders of anterior teeth appears to be more pronounced than on I. acuarius (Cappetta 1970, Case 1980, Müller 1999). The transition from main cusp to lateral shoulders appears to be slightly more angular on teeth of I. lerichei (Darteville and Casier 1943).
Original diagnose after Cicimurri & Knight (2019) p. 11 [27380]: Nearly 400 specimens are referred to the new species, which differs from Recent Isogomphodon oxyrhynchus (Müller and Henle 1841) in that all teeth have smooth cutting edges extending from the apex to the very base of the crown. In contrast, the upper teeth of the extant species are weakly serrated and edges of lower anterior teeth are often limited to the upper half of the crown. In addition, the Eocene teeth have shorter cusps, many exhibit very convex lateral shoulders (especially more lateral positions), and the root lobes are more elongated and divergent (Herman et al. 1991, Compagno et al. 2005). The new species differs from the fossil species I. acuarius (Probst 1879), I. lerichei (Darteville and Casier 1943), I. caunellensis (Cappetta 1970), and I. gracilis (Jonet 1966) in being smaller in overall size. Additionally, the Dry Branch species has narrower upper anterior teeth and complete cutting edges on all teeth when compared to I. caunellensis, and the convexity of the lateral shoulders of anterior teeth appears to be more pronounced than on I. acuarius (Cappetta 1970, Case 1980, Müller 1999). The transition from main cusp to lateral shoulders appears to be slightly more angular on teeth of I. lerichei (Darteville and Casier 1943).
References
Combining palaeontological and neontological data shows a delayed diversification burst of carcharhiniform sharks likely mediated by environmental change. Scientific Reports, 12, Article 21906
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-26010-7
Feeding ecology has shaped the evolution of modern sharks. Current Biology, 31(23), 5138–5148
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.09.028
Combining palaeontological and neontological data shows a delayed diversification burst of carcharhiniform sharks likely mediated by environmental change. Scientific Reports, 12, Article 21906
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-26010-7
Feeding ecology has shaped the evolution of modern sharks. Current Biology, 31(23), 5138–5148
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.09.028