Xiphodolamia ensis

Leidy, 1877


Classification: Elasmobranchii Lamniformes Xiphodolamiidae

Reference of the original description
Leidy, J. (1877)
Description of vertebrate remains, chiefly from the Phosphate Beds of South Carolina. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 8(2), 209–261

Image of the original description

Xiphodolamia ensis fig. 25-30 pl. 34 of Leidy (1877)

Synonyms / new combinations and misspellings
Xyphodolamia ensis

Types
Xiphodolamia ensis



Description:


Citation: Xiphodolamia ensis Leidy, 1877: In: Database of fossil elasmobranch teeth www.shark-references.com, World Wide Web electronic publication, Version 11/2024

Please send your images of "Xiphodolamia ensis" to info@shark-references.com

Xiphodolamia ensis fig. 25-30 pl. 34 of Leidy (1877)

Description
Original diagnose after Leidy (1877) p. 252: While engaged in describing some unusual forms of the teeth of Sharks, I take the opportunity of noticing another from the marls of New Jersey. The teeth to which I refer arc probably symphysial, but their relationship with lateral associates remains undetermined. The museum of the Academy contains twelve of these teeth, of which six are from Vincenttown, presented by Col. T. M. Bryan; four from Monmouth Co., presented by Dr. P. Knieskern; one from Burlington Co., presented by Dr. C. C. Abbott; and one from Allowaystown, presented by Dr. H. C. Yarrow. The teeth have the general appearance of those of Lamna laterally compressed. The crown of the tooth usually, as represented in figures 25-28, Plate xxxiv., has a sigmoid sabre-like form with the anterior bonier sharp and the posterior border obtuse. The root has the construction of that of a Lamna tooth, but the two sides appear pressed towards each other•, so that the processes are directed obliquely and parallel. In some teeth, as in figure 27, the processes are nearly or quite equal; in other teeth, as in figures 25, 26, one process is shorter ihan the other. Figures 29 and 30 represent. transitional forms from that nbove indicated to the more ordinary one of Lamna teeth. In one of these, fig. 29, the crown is sharp a short distance below the point on the outer border, as it is the entire length along the inner border; in that of fig. 30 the crown is sharp along both • borders. The root in both teeth is not laterally compressed, but has nearly the common form seen in most teeth of Sharks.

Remarks
shark-references Species-ID=7528;


valid after Leidy (1877) p. 252 [1420]; Cicimurri & Ebersole (2021) p. 156 [30370];


References
Rudebeck, B. & Riehmann, H. (2022)
Fossile hajtaender fra Trelde Naes. Self-published
Cicimurri, D.J. & Ebersole, J.A. (2021)
New Paleogene elasmobranch (Chondrichthyes) records from the Gulf Coastal Plain of the United States, including a new species of Carcharhinus de Blainville, 1816. Cainozoic Research, 21(2), 147–164
Bazzi, M. & Campione, N.E. & Kear, B.P. & Pimiento, C. & Ahlberg, P.E. (2021)
Feeding ecology has shaped the evolution of modern sharks. Current Biology, 31(23), 5138–5148
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.09.028
Adnet, S. & Feichtinger, I. & Harzhauser, M. & Pollerspöck, J. (2021)
A mesopelagic selachian fauna from the middle Eocene of St. Pankraz (Austria) reveals homogeneity in deep-marine environments during the warm period in Europe. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen, 301(1), 25–63
DOI: 10.1127/njgpa/2021/0996
Condamine, F.L. & Romieu, J. & Guinot, G. (2019)
Climate cooling and clade competition likely drove the decline of lamniform sharks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(41), 20584–20590
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1902693116
Malyshkina, T.P. & Ward, D.J. (2016)
The Turanian Basin in the Eocene: the new data on the fossil sharks and rays from the Kyzylkum Desert (Uzbekistan). Proceedings of the Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, 320(1), 50–65
Maisch, H.M. & Becker, M.A. & Chamberlain, J.A. (2015)
Chondrichthyans from a lag deposit between the Shark River Formation (Middle Eocene) and Kirkwood Formation (Early Miocene), Monmouth county, New Jersey. Paludicola, 10(3), 149–183
Carlsen, A.W. & Cuny, G. (2014)
A study of the sharks and rays from the Lillebælt Clay (Early–Middle Eocene) of Denmark, and their palaeoecology. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark, 62, 39–88
DOI: 10.37570/bgsd-2014-62-04
Moreau, F. & Dion, M. & Mathis, S. (2013)
Présence des genres Xiphodolamia et Isistius (Chondrichthyes, Elasmobranchii) à l’Eocène du Bassin de Paris. Cossmanniana, 15, 85–98
King, C. & Iakovleva, A. & Steurbaut, E. & Heilmann-Clausen, C. & Ward, D. (2013)
The Aktulagay section, west Kazakhstan: a key site fornorthern mid-latitude Early Eocene stratigraphy. Stratigraphy, 10(3): 171–209
Diedrich, C.G. (2012)
Eocene (Lutetian) Shark-Rich Coastal Paleoenvironments of the Southern North Sea Basin in Europe: Biodiversity of the Marine Fürstenau Formation Including Early White and Megatooth Sharks. International Journal of Oceanography, 2012, Article ID 565326
DOI: 10.1155/2012/565326
Van den Eeckhaut, G. & De Schutter, P.J. (2009)
The Elasmobranch Fauna of the Lede Sand Formation at Oosterzele (Lutetian, Middle Eocene of Belgium). Palaeofocus, 1, 1–57
Rayner, D. & Mitchell, T. & Rayner, M. (2009)
London Clay Fossils of Kent and Essex. Rochester, Kent, Medway Fossil and Mineral Society, 228 p, ISBN: 978–0–9538243–1–1
Adnet, S. & Hosseinzadeh, R. & Antunes, M.T. & Balbino, A.C. & Kozlov, V.A. & Cappetta, H. (2009)
Review of the enigmatic Eocene shark genus Xiphodolamia (Chondrichthyes, Lamniformes) and description of a new species recovered from Angola, Iran and Jordan. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 55(3–4), 197–204
DOI: 10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2009.04.005
Mustafa, H.A. & Zalmout, I.S. & Smadi, A.A. & Nazzal, I. (2005)
Review of the Middle Eocene (Lutetian) selachian fauna of Jebal eth Thuleithuwat, east Jordan. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen, 237(3), 399–422
Smadi, A. & Abu Azzam, H. & Zalmout, I.S. & Mustafa, H.A. (2003)
Middle Eocene selachian fauna from Wadi Al-Rijla Al-Bayda, Eastern Desert of Jordan. Abhath Al–Yamouk Basic Sciences and Engineering, 12(2b), 619–631
González-Barba, G. (2003)
Descripción de asociaciones faunísticas de elasmobranquios fósiles del eoceno superior (Priaboniano) de las formaciones Tepetate y Bateque de Baja California Sur, México. unpublished Thesis, La Paz, Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas. XIII, 226 p.
Clouter, F. & Mitchell, T. & Rayner, D. & Rayner, M. (2000)
London Clay Fossils of the Isle of Sheppey. Medway Lapidary and Mineral Society, ISBN 0-9538243-0-6, 100pp.
Kent, B.W. (1994)
Fossil Sharks of the Chesapeake Bay Region. Egan Rees and Boyer, Inc. Columbia. 146 pp.
Belyaev, G.M. & Glikman, L.S. (1970)
The Teeth of Sharks on the Floor of the Pacific Ocean. Trudy Instituta Okaenologii, Academiia Nauk SSSR, 88, 236–276
Rapp, W.F. (1946)
Check list of the fossil fishes of New Jersey. Journal of Paleontology, 20(5), 510–513
Menner, V.V. (1928)
Les Sélaciens du Paléogène de Manghyschlak, d'Emba et du versant oriental d'Oural. «in russian». Bulletin de la Société Impériale des Naturalistes de Moscou, Section Géologique, 6(3–4), 292–338
Fowler, H.W. (1911)
A description of the fossil fish remains of the Cretaceous, Eocene and Miocene formations of New-Jersey. Geological Survey of New Jersey Bulletin, 4: 182 p., 108 fig.
Hay, O.P. (1902)
Bibliography and catalogue of the fossil Vertebrata of North America. Bulletin of the United States Geological and Geographical Survey of the Territories, 179, 1–868
Leidy, J. (1877)
Description of vertebrate remains, chiefly from the Phosphate Beds of South Carolina. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 8(2), 209–261