Callorhinchus hectori

Newton, 1876


Classification: Holocephali Chimaeriformes Callorhinchidae

Reference of the original description
Newton, E.T. (1876)
On Two Chimaeroid Jaws from the Lower Greensand of New Zealand. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 32, 326–331

Synonyms / new combinations and misspellings
Callorhynchus hectori

Types
Callorhinchus hectori



Description:


Citation: Callorhinchus hectori Newton, 1876: In: Database of fossil elasmobranch teeth www.shark-references.com, World Wide Web electronic publication, Version 12/2024

No image available.
Please send your images of "Callorhinchus hectori" to
info@shark-references.com

Remarks
shark-references Species-ID=8010;

References
Kriwet, J. & Gazdzicki, A. (2003)
New Eocene Antarctic chimeroid fish (Holocephali, Chimaeriformes). Polish Polar Research 24(1), 29–51
Wiffen, J. (1980)
Moanasaurus, a new genus of marine reptile (Family Mosasauridae) from the Upper Cretaceous of North Island, New Zealand, New Zealand. Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 23(4), 507–528
DOI: 10.1080/00288306.1980.10424122
Chapman, F. (1918)
Descriptions and revisions of the Cretaceous and Tertiary fish-remains of New-Zealand. New Zealand Department of Mines, Geological Survey Branch, Palaeontological Bulletin, 7, 1–45
Woodward, A.S. (1891)
Catalogue of the fossil fishes in the British Museum (Natural History). Part II. containing the Elasmobranchii (Acanthodii). Holocephali, Ichthyodorulites, Ostracodermi, Dipnoi, and Teleostomi (Crossopterygii and chondrostean Actinopterygii). XLIV + 567 pp.(Taylor & Francis), London.
Davis, J.W. (1888)
On fossil fish-remains from the Tertiary and Cretaceo-Tertiary formations of New-Zealand. Scientific Transactions of the Royal Dublin Society, Series 2, 4, 1–48
Newton, E.T. (1878)
The chimeroid fishes of the British Cretaceous rocks. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of the United Kingdom, Monograph, 4: 1–64
Newton, E.T. (1876)
On Two Chimaeroid Jaws from the Lower Greensand of New Zealand. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 32, 326–331