Xenodolamia simplex
Leidy, 1877
Classification: Elasmobranchii Lamniformes incert. fam.
Reference of the original description
Description of vertebrate remains, chiefly from the Phosphate Beds of South Carolina. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 8(2), 209–261
Description of vertebrate remains, chiefly from the Phosphate Beds of South Carolina. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 8(2), 209–261
Types
Xenodolamia simplex
Xenodolamia simplex
Description:
Citation: Xenodolamia simplex Leidy, 1877: In: Database of fossil elasmobranch teeth www.shark-references.com, World Wide Web electronic publication, Version 12/2024
Please send your images of "Xenodolamia simplex" to info@shark-references.com
Xenodolamia simplex fig. 35-36 pl. 34 of Leidy (1877)
Xenodolamia simplex fig. 35-36 pl. 34 of Leidy (1877)
Description
Original diagnose after Leidy (1877) p. 251-252: The remaining pair of teeth perhaps belong to a different species and genus. The crown is very much smaller in proportion to the root than in the former, and its lateral borders are not denticulated. The tooth represented in figure 35 has a small oblique, demiconoidal crown with a rather wide and slightly recurved summit. The root is of comparatively enormous proportion, and resembles in shape that of ti1e large tooth first described. Length of the tooth from the root notch, 5 lines; length of crown, 1 1/2 lines ; breadth at base, 2 3/4 lines ; length of root, 6 3/4 lines; breadth, 7 lines. The tooth of figure 36 has the crown proportionately larger and the root thicker but narrower, and with bu t feebly developed processes. Length of the tooth, 6 lines; length of the crown, 2 lines; breadth at base, 3 1/2 lines; length of crown at middle, 4 1/2 lines; breadth, 4 lines; thickness, 3 lines.
Original diagnose after Leidy (1877) p. 251-252: The remaining pair of teeth perhaps belong to a different species and genus. The crown is very much smaller in proportion to the root than in the former, and its lateral borders are not denticulated. The tooth represented in figure 35 has a small oblique, demiconoidal crown with a rather wide and slightly recurved summit. The root is of comparatively enormous proportion, and resembles in shape that of ti1e large tooth first described. Length of the tooth from the root notch, 5 lines; length of crown, 1 1/2 lines ; breadth at base, 2 3/4 lines ; length of root, 6 3/4 lines; breadth, 7 lines. The tooth of figure 36 has the crown proportionately larger and the root thicker but narrower, and with bu t feebly developed processes. Length of the tooth, 6 lines; length of the crown, 2 lines; breadth at base, 3 1/2 lines; length of crown at middle, 4 1/2 lines; breadth, 4 lines; thickness, 3 lines.
Remarks
shark-references Species-ID=13065;
valid after Leidy (1877) p. 251 [1420]; Hay (1902) p. 309 [1095]
shark-references Species-ID=13065;
valid after Leidy (1877) p. 251 [1420]; Hay (1902) p. 309 [1095]
References
Bibliography and catalogue of the fossil Vertebrata of North America. Bulletin of the United States Geological and Geographical Survey of the Territories, 179, 1–868
Description of vertebrate remains, chiefly from the Phosphate Beds of South Carolina. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 8(2), 209–261
Bibliography and catalogue of the fossil Vertebrata of North America. Bulletin of the United States Geological and Geographical Survey of the Territories, 179, 1–868
Description of vertebrate remains, chiefly from the Phosphate Beds of South Carolina. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 8(2), 209–261
